LIBERO experiments
We compare against a SmolVLA-0.25B base retrained under our settings, using 160k policy-training steps and a common evaluation protocol. Both the retrained baseline and XS-VLA unfreeze the VLM during policy training.
XS-VLA improves average success by 4.25 percentage points over the retrained base, with the largest gain on the Long suite.
Reporting precision. As in the paper, LIBERO table success rates are rounded to one decimal place; the text retains more precise values where reported. For example, 361/400 = 90.25%, displayed as 90.3% in the tables. These are the same result. Average episode steps retain two decimal places.
Each run uses 100 evaluation episodes per suite (10 per task), 400 total, with the same evaluation seed and protocol. Training seed 1004 scores 93/93/85/90% on Spatial/Object/Goal/Long and 90.25% overall. Both XS-VLA training seeds achieve 361/400 successes; the retrained base achieves 344/400. Two-seed suite means are 93.0 / 92.0 / 86.5 / 89.5%. Baseline and ablation rows each represent one training run.
Ablations and loss controls
Suite values are percentages. LFM includes posterior conditioning, KL regularization, and Huber regression. The base and CSD-only configurations use MSE. XS-VLA (MSE) retains the latent branch and KL schedule, changing only the regression loss. Average steps count environment steps per episode, including the effects of success and termination.
The matched image-only pretraining control reaches 88.75% with LFM. Using CSD initialization raises this to 90.25%, providing evidence for a benefit beyond image exposure alone in the evaluated runs.
With CSD and Huber fixed, adding the posterior-conditioning and KL branch raises success from 86.50% to 90.25%. This gain supports the regularized latent branch as a whole; changing the regression loss alone does not explain it.